I explore some of the reasons for the implicit shame and embarrassment that many academics, myself included, feel about their unfinished pieces and practices of writing. I question the sources of such ideals, and suggest some resistance to the ideal through advocating care for ideas, rather than ideals. I query where assumptions about writing as a clean, fast and easy process come from, and counter these assumptions with values of mess, uncertainty and struggle. Academics are invited to venture out of their closets of writing, and risk some exposure of the process through either shared drafts or honest conversations.
Essay Writing Service - Home - Online Essay Writer
Velany Rodrigues. More often than not, when researchers set about writing a paper, they spend the most time on the "meat" of the article the Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. A negligent or sloppy attitude towards these three vital elements in the research paper format would be almost equivalent to leaving the accessibility of the research paper up to chance and lucky guessing of target words, indirectly making the effort and time expended on the research and publication process almost null and void. It could be said that the keywords, title, and abstract operate in a system analogous to a chain reaction. This functional advantage alone serves to make an abstract an indispensable component within the research paper format. However, formulating the abstract of a research paper can be a tedious task, given that abstracts need to be fairly comprehensive, without giving too much away. This is mainly because if readers get all the details of the research paper in the abstract itself, they might be discouraged from reading the entire article.